How to improve and measure your body composition

You may have started a new diet and exercise program and feel you are making progress. But when you step on the scale, nothing has changed. Does that mean your efforts “aren’t working?”

Not necessarily.

Or, maybe your doctor tells you that your body mass index (BMI) is high. Do you know what that means, and is it necessarily bad news?

It depends.

The scale and BMI are rudimentary tools for gauging your overall body composition, meaning they don’t tell you enough to determine if you are at a healthy weight.

Here’s an example. A professional athlete may be six feet tall (183 cm), weigh 225 pounds (102 kg), and be in fantastic physical condition with a 32-inch waist (81 cm) and bulging muscles. A busy doctor may be six feet tall and weigh 225 pounds with a 39-inch waist (99 cm) and a bulging midsection.

They have the same weight and the same BMI, but very different health assessments. What’s different? The two men have different amounts of muscle tissue and fat mass. The athlete has a healthy body composition. The doctor perhaps does not.

Knowing your body composition gives you a better picture of your overall health than just knowing weight or BMI.


What is body composition and why is it important?


  • Body composition refers to the absolute or relative amounts of fat and lean mass.
  • Muscle, bones, and water make up lean mass.
  • Increasing lean body mass can reduce the risk of many chronic diseases and can significantly improve health and functional status.

Or, watch a summary of this guide where you’ll learn how to improve and measure your body composition

Body composition refers to the amount of fat, muscle, bone, and water that contributes to your total weight. Body composition can be expressed as a percentage (like body fat percentage) or an absolute amount (like pounds of muscle mass). Muscle, bone, and water are frequently combined and referred to as lean body mass, which differentiates them from fat mass.

As we describe in our healthy weight loss guide, not all weight loss is “healthy.” Ideally, losing weight means losing mostly fat mass — not lean mass — with minimal reduction in your resting metabolic rate.1 To assess this aspect of healthy weight loss, you need to know your body composition.

For better health, most people want to lose fat mass and preserve or gain lean mass. Preserving muscle and bone helps prevent sarcopenia (muscle loss), frailty, and osteopenia (bone loss), in addition to improving the ability to do everyday tasks.2

Higher muscle mass with lower fat mass may also be related to a lower risk of heart disease, cancer, and dementia, and may be a predictor of longevity.3

For some people, improving body composition has nothing to do with losing weight. Numerous studies have called attention to the health risk of having a normal weight while also having a number of metabolic risk factors more commonly associated with obesity. This is often referred to as “normal weight obesity” or colloquially as “thin on the outside and fat on the inside (TOFI).”4

How to achieve better body composition


  • A simple definition of improved body composition is decreased fat mass with increased or preserved muscle mass.
  • A high protein, low carb diet may be one of the most effective ways to reduce fat mass while maintaining or increasing lean mass.
  • Intermittent fasting and other means of calorie reduction may also help lower fat mass but should be augmented with resistance training to preserve lean mass.
  • Resistance training exercise is the most effective way to increase lean body mass.
The keys to improving your body composition are:

  • Sustainably reducing your calories to lower excess body fat.
  • Getting enough protein to promote muscle growth.
  • Using exercise to stimulate your muscles to build lean mass.

While there is more than one way to accomplish these goals, here are the best tips, backed by science, to improve your body composition.


Nutrition is vital for improving body composition. What you eat and how much you eat can have a significant impact on losing fat mass and gaining muscle mass. Here are some of the best ways to eat, according to science, to help you improve your body composition.

High protein for building muscle

High protein meal for building muscles

Protein is the most important macronutrient for building muscle, especially if you are trying to eat fewer calories than you’re burning.5 Protein supplies muscles with amino acids, the building blocks muscles need to grow and strengthen.6
The data are fairly consistent that most people would improve their lean muscle mass by regularly getting enough protein to promote muscle protein synthesis.7

Eating more protein than the average American helps maximize the muscle-building benefits of resistance training, and people who engage in resistance training or endurance-type exercise need more protein than do people of the same height and weight who are sedentary.8

How much more? For the average person, the maximal muscle-building effect likely occurs around 1.6 grams per kilogram of reference body weight per day.9 There may be benefits from even higher levels of protein, especially if you do intense exercise or if you are looking to improve weight loss and satiety.10

Use this simple chart to find out what your minimum daily protein target should be, based on your height.11

Minimum daily protein target

Under 5’4″ ( < 163 cm) 90 grams 105 grams
5’4″ to 5’7″ (163 to 170 cm) 100 grams 110 grams
5’8″ to 5’10” (171 to 178 cm) 110 grams 120 grams
5’11” to 6’2″ (179 to 188 cm) 120 grams 130 grams
Over 6’2″ (188 cm +) 130 grams 140 grams

Low carb for fat loss

In addition to increasing protein, decreasing carbs can have a beneficial effect on body composition. Numerous studies report improved body composition with a low carb diet.

In 2019, researchers from Virta Health published a two-year study of the keto diet reporting a 15% reduction in abdominal fat.12

Other studies show a low carb diet leads to greater loss of fat mass than a low fat diet.13 In one randomized trial, low carb dieters lost 22.8% of their abdominal fat, compared to only 1% for the low fat dieters.14

And another study reports an 11% reduction in intra-abdominal fat for low carb eaters compared to a 1% reduction for low fat dieters.15

Finally, one randomized controlled trial reports decreased fat mass and maintenance of lean mass in women following a ketogenic diet.16


Calorie reduction for fat loss

Improving body composition involves gaining or preserving muscle and losing fat mass. As we have shown, eating protein can significantly improve muscle mass. Low carb eating can help you lose body fat, as we detailed in the previous section. But so too can practically any means of reducing your calorie intake.17

The key, however, is reducing calories in a way that helps you lose fat mass without also losing muscle mass.18 This can be a tricky balance.

In some studies, calorie restriction leads predominantly to fat-mass loss. One randomized trial reports that 12 weeks of calorie restriction reduced fat mass by 11 pounds (5 kilos) and visceral fat by 16%.19 However, consistent with clinical experience, other studies question the sustainability of calorie-restricted diets and their long-term results. One randomized trial using a low fat, calorie-restricted diet reports that at eight years, participants lost only 4.4 pounds (2 kilos), almost all from lean mass rather than fat mass.20

Fortunately, there are other ways to naturally reduce caloric intake, such as eating a higher protein diet.21

Protein may help you eat less because it can reduce appetite and prevent overeating by triggering the release of hormones that promote feelings of fullness and satisfaction.22 Your body also burns more calories digesting protein compared to fat or carbs.23

And since low carb diets also help people spontaneously eat fewer calories, it makes sense that combining low carb and high protein is a recipe for successful fat loss and muscle gain.24

Low carb recipes

Short-term intermittent fasting for fat loss

Time-restricted eating or short-term intermittent fasting, of less than 36 hours, can help with fat-mass loss with minimal to no loss of muscle mass. However, with longer fasting periods, there is a concern about losing muscle mass.

One study shows that six weeks of alternate-day fasting led to a 7% overall weight loss, most of it fat mass.25

Another randomized trial reports more significant fat-mass loss with intermittent calorie restriction than with traditional dieting.26

And an analysis of eight studies looking at time-restricted eating or alternate-day fasting plus resistance training demonstrates maintenance or even an increase in muscle mass.27

Although not all studies agree. For instance, one randomized controlled trial that did not dictate how much or what the subjects ate didn’t demonstrate a benefit for lean mass in those doing 16:8 time-restricted eating.28 One potential lesson is that your diet quality and total caloric intake are still important when engaging in time-restricted eating.

Older studies with longer fasting periods report a negative nitrogen balance — a marker of muscle loss.29 This suggests that the duration of fasting may play a critical role in your body-composition response.

What should we make of this evidence? Time-restricted eating and short-term intermittent fasting may help reduce calories without significant muscle-mass loss. But longer fasts may lead to muscle-mass loss, and what you eat during your “eating window” may impact your body-composition response. Given the limited amount of research in this field, we need studies that assess the long-term effects of intermittent fasting on body composition.

What to avoid to improve body composition

When looking to improve your body composition, what you don’t eat may be just as important as what you do eat. Here are three things to avoid to improve your body composition.

1. Alcohol
Alcohol provides calories without nutrition which can make it difficult to sustainably reduce caloric intake. In addition, alcohol can diminish inhibitions and self control, leading to excessive calorie consumption.30
2. Sugar
Sugar provides calories without nutrition and stimulates the brain’s reward center, encouraging you to eat more and stimulating your cravings.31
3. Ultra-processed foods
Engineered foods like chips, crackers, and treats are designed to make you want more. They tend to be high in fat and carbs, with little protein or nutrition. Their satiety index is very low, and thus you can easily overeat them.32


High protein diets are most beneficial for adding muscle mass. High protein, low carb diets are also beneficial for losing fat mass and improving satiety.

Other dietary approaches that reduce calories, including intermittent fasting, may also improve body composition, but too much calorie restriction for too long may negatively impact muscle mass.


In addition to proper nutrition, exercise can be a powerful tool for improving body composition. Here’s what science has to say about the best exercises.

Time to pump that iron.
Resistance training

Resistance training may be the most impactful intervention to increase lean body mass — including both muscle and bone mass.

Other forms of exercise — such as aerobic exercise like walking and jogging — are helpful for cardiovascular fitness and can improve blood sugar and blood pressure, but resistance training is superior when it comes to building muscle.33 Resistance training is also beneficial for reducing body fat and visceral fat — that’s a powerful combination!34

What does resistance training mean? Many people think it means going to the gym and pumping heavy iron alongside bodybuilders and muscle-bulging athletes.

That is not the case.

Resistance training means moving your muscles against resistance. That could mean using your body weight as resistance (such as squats or wall pushups), using elastic bands as resistance, or using two-pound weights.

As long as you continue to challenge your muscles, they will maintain or grow. Unlike fat loss, which happens across your whole body, building muscle with resistance training has a very targeted effect. If you only work your arms, only your arms will gain muscle and your legs will remain unaffected.

Here are some helpful tips to get started with resistance training:35

Emphasize safety first

The last thing you want is to get injured and swear off resistance training as too dangerous. If you can, work with a personal trainer until you are comfortable on your own.

Start low and build slow. The ultimate goal may be to challenge your muscles with higher levels of resistance, but there’s no hurry to get there. Start with a resistance level you can do for 15 reps, but stop at 12 reps. Safety first.

Pro tip: Consider every exercise as an exercise for your stomach, back, and glute muscles (the ones you sit on). If you keep your glutes and lower abdominal muscles engaged for all your exercises, it helps build stability and can decrease the strain on your lower back and other sensitive muscle groups.

Work multiple muscle groups

Make sure to work multiple muscle groups rather than focusing on just one. Bicep curls work one particular muscle group — your biceps. But a squat with a bicep curl and shoulder press is a complex movement that works almost your whole body — your quads, glutes, biceps, core, and deltoids.

Plus, complex movements are more functional and will provide you with the real-world strength you need for life. They help you become that rare 80-year-old who can put their own luggage in the overhead bin.

Gradually increase the resistance

You may want to aim for lifting the heaviest resistance that you safely can for eight reps for two sets separated by a short rest. A “rep” is how many repetitions you can perform an exercise without resting. For example, one pushup equals one rep. A set is how many times you can repeat a number of reps, usually separated by a brief rest.

If you start as we suggested above — lifting a weight you can lift for 15 reps but stopping at 12 — you can gradually increase the resistance and lower the reps until you are nearing your max effort on the eighth repetition.

Just remember to engage your core with every rep! This is especially important as the weight increases.

Use the time you have

Can you commit 30 minutes to resistance training three days per week? Great! That may be all you need to see improvements.

Do you only have 10 minutes twice per week? That’s OK, too.

One important rule is “something is better than nothing.” Don’t fall into the trap of thinking it isn’t worth exercising if you can’t do a minimum amount of time or number of days. Yes, it may be better to exercise three days per week than once per week, but don’t get discouraged! One session is better than no exercise.

Don’t forget to rest

Building muscle mass requires stressing the muscle and then letting it recover and heal. That means you should aim for three days per week with an active rest day between each resistance training session.36

Other exercises

People taking a walk

Cardio training may not be the best for building muscle, but it can be helpful for burning fat.37 The downside to cardio is that you generally need to commit to longer workouts to see substantial benefits.38 But if you have the time and commitment, you should go for it!

The best training program may be a combination of resistance training three days per week with cardio or intervals on three days, with a day off that might include stretching or mobility work.

And remember, both walking and running are considered “weight-bearing exercises” and can improve your lower-body bone mass. Just don’t ignore your upper-body strength!

High-intensity interval training is also helpful for fat-mass loss and you can include it as part of your training program. However, some studies suggest HIIT may not be suitable for an initial weight loss plan for those unfamiliar with interval training.39 Also, make sure you pay attention to injury prevention, starting slow and building the duration and intensity of your exercise routine gradually.

For more details about what exercise regimen is best for you, see our detailed guide on exercise and health.

And to learn more about bone health, see our dedicated guide on low carb diets and bone health.

How to measure body composition

You can measure your body composition in many different ways — from expensive, complex scans to simple at-home tests requiring nothing more than a tape measure. Here are some of the most common methods and our recommendations for which you may want to consider.

Waist circumference

Perhaps the easiest and least technical way to estimate your body composition is measuring your waist circumference. Since the most important weight to lose is the weight around your middle, known as “belly fat,” improving your waist circumference can have a meaningful impact on your health.

Greater abdominal circumference in relation to height (waist-to-height ratio) is predictive of an increased risk of diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and overall mortality, even in people of normal weight.40 While this isn’t a perfect test, it is very easy to do, does not require a doctor’s order, and can give you a good starting point to see if you might have insulin resistance.

To get your waist-to-height ratio, just divide your waist measurement by your height. A waist-to-height ratio less than 0.5 indicates good insulin sensitivity, while a number higher than 0.5 indicates worsening insulin resistance.

You don’t even need a tape measure. Just take a piece of string! The length of string around your waist should be, at most, half your height. If your waist is larger than half your height, you likely have insulin resistance.

One of the great strengths of this measurement is that your ethnicity doesn’t matter, nor does it matter whether you are male or female, young or old, short or tall, muscular or wiry — a number higher than 0.5 indicates increased risk.41


Another simple way of tracking your body composition is taking selfies to track your physical appearance. Make sure you take the pictures in the same location, time of day, and zoom. You can track the size of your abdomen and the definition of your muscles.

Even if your weight isn’t changing much, if you see your abdomen getting smaller and your muscles getting bigger or more defined, then you are likely improving your body composition.

And, no, you don’t need to share your selfies on social media! Just because many like to make their journey public doesn’t mean you have to. Feel free to put the pictures in a private file and keep them locked away for only you to see.

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)

A DEXA scan uses low dose radiation and accurately detects your amount of lean mass and fat mass, the amount of visceral fat, and the density of your bones.42 The results are more detailed and accurate than bioimpedance scales, but the scan may be less available and more expensive to obtain.

Given the low-dose radiation involved, most people suggest waiting at least 3-6 months between DEXA scans.

Just be sure that you’re getting a DEXA scan that assesses body composition. Most routine DEXA scans are ordered only to look at bone density.

When considering the combination of accuracy and detailed information, a DEXA scan may be the best choice, although cost can be a barrier.

Pros: Most accurate and detailed body composition information

Cons: Not for home use, small radiation dose, cost, and availability

Bioimpedance scales

Bioimpedance scales provide an estimate of fat-free mass and fat mass by using a small electric current to measure the “resistance” of your body tissue.43 These scales are easy to use, widely available, and relatively inexpensive compared to some of the other methods we discuss.

However, most home scales measure body composition in your lower body only, which limits their utility as much of the concerning fat mass is in the abdomen and trunk. Some have handles you can hold to also measure your upper body, but these are more expensive and usually located only at gyms or personal training centers.

But even these more expensive scales are affected by non-standardization of body position, recent exercise, and hydration status. This means that checking your body composition on one of these scales before and after your workout could yield different results.

Bioimpedance scales are not as accurate as DEXA scans but can be used to track trends over time. For instance, an accurate DEXA may show you to have 30% body fat with much of it centered around your abdomen and trunk, while the bioimpedance scale may say you have 20% body fat, as it misses much of the obesity around your middle. But if your bioimpedance numbers are dropping over time, you can still use that to gauge improvement.

These scales are best for people who want to track changes in daily or weekly measurements, but it may be worth adding a DEXA once a year to follow more accurate, absolute measurements.

Pros: Easy to get for home use

Cons: Less accurate than other measurements

Hydrostatic weight

For this one, you need to get wet.

Here’s how it works. First, you weigh yourself on dry land. Then you sit on a scale, submerge yourself underwater and blow out as much air as you can. The result is the difference between your dry weight and your underwater weight, which can help estimate your fat mass and fat-free mass.

This type of measurement can’t differentiate between bone, muscle, and water which all make up the fat-free mass. Nor can it tell you where your fat mass is distributed — visceral, abdominal, etc. But it is an easy way to accurately measure your total fat mass — as long as you don’t mind getting wet.

Pros: No radiation, quick test, and good test-to-test accuracy

Cons: You have to get wet! Not for home use, and may be difficult to find access to the specialized underwater scale

Air Displacement Plethysmograph (ADP)

Another device rising in popularity is the BOD POD, a type of ADP that measures your body’s volume by measuring the amount of air your body displaces when in a specialized measuring chamber.44

It provides results similar to hydrostatic weight — it reports fat mass and fat-free mass — but it doesn’t give as much detail as a DEXA.

Also, if you are claustrophobic, a BOD POD may not be the right test for you as you have to spend several minutes in an enclosed chamber (although there is a window to see out of which does help some with mild claustrophobia).

Pros: No radiation, quick test, good test-to-test accuracy
Cons: Not for home use, may be limited availability, cost, and difficult for those with claustrophobia


Other body composition tests tend to not be as accurate or practical. For instance, measuring skin folds with manual calipers rely on general equations that may be less accurate than other measurements and have significant test-to-test variability.45

Other imaging studies, like MRIs or CTs, are expensive and have very limited availability. They are mostly used for research purposes and are impractical and less available for the general public.


Easiest: Waist circumference

Most accurate: DEXA

Best for regular home use: Bioimpedance scales

Best of the rest: Hydrostatic weight and BOD POD if they are easily available

The best way to improve your body composition

Improving body composition includes decreasing fat mass and increasing lean body mass — muscle and bone mass.

Sustainable calorie reduction has the strongest evidence for fat-mass loss.

A combination of a low carb, high protein diet with resistance training may be the most effective for sustainably losing fat mass and maintaining muscle mass. Adding cardio or HIIT exercise can further help with losing fat mass.

Resistance training and higher protein diets (around 1.6 grams per kilo of ideal body weight per day) have the best evidence supporting their role in improving muscle mass.

Now you should have all the information needed to get started improving your body composition today!

How to improve and measure your body composition - the evidence

This guide is written by Dr. Bret Scher, MD and was last updated on January 30, 2023. It was medically reviewed by Dr. Michael Tamber, MD on July 20, 2021.

The guide contains scientific references. You can find these in the notes throughout the text, and click the links to read the peer-reviewed scientific papers. When appropriate we include a grading of the strength of the evidence, with a link to our policy on this. Our evidence-based guides are updated at least once per year to reflect and reference the latest science on the topic.

All our evidence-based health guides are written or reviewed by medical doctors who are experts on the topic. To stay unbiased we show no ads, sell no physical products, and take no money from the industry. We're fully funded by the people, via an optional membership. Most information at Diet Doctor is free forever.

Read more about our policies and work with evidence-based guides, nutritional controversies, our editorial team, and our medical review board.

Should you find any inaccuracy in this guide, please email andreas@dietdoctor.com.

  1. Resting metabolic rate is essentially the amount of calories you burn at rest. You can learn more about it in our podcast with Kirsty Woods, PhD.

  2. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019: Osteoporosis and sarcopenia increase frailty syndrome in the elderly[overview article; ungraded]

  3. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2014: Measuring outcomes in adult weight loss studies that include diet and physical activity: a systematic review
    [review of non-randomized studies; weak evidence]

    American Journal of Medicine 2014: Muscle mass index as a predictor of longevity in older adults
    [non-controlled study; weak evidence]

  4. Indian Journal of endocrinology and metabolism 2018: Lean metabolic syndrome: An emerging concept
    [overview article; ungraded]

    Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2014: Risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease in metabolically unhealthy normal-weight and metabolically healthy obese individuals
    [observational study; weak evidence]

    Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases 2006: Normal weight obese (NWO) women: an evaluation of a candidate new syndrome
    [observational study; weak evidence]

  5. Advances in Nutrition 2019: Recent advances in the characterization of skeletal muscle and whole-body protein responses to dietary protein and exercise during negative energy balance
    [overview article; ungraded]

    Medicine Science Sports and Exercise 2010: Increased protein intake reduces lean body mass loss during weight loss in athletes
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  6. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003: Essential amino acids are primarily responsible for the amino acid stimulation of muscle protein anabolism in healthy elderly adults
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  7. A meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that eating more protein than average leads to better lean body mass.

    Journal of Nutrition 2020 The role of protein intake and its timing on body composition and muscle function in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    [ strong evidence]

    Observational studies show those who have greater protein intake have greater muscle mass.

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2016: Relation between mealtime distribution of protein intake and lean mass loss in free-living older adults of the NuAge study

    [nutritional epidemiology study with HR<2, very weak evidence]

    American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2008: Dietary protein intake is associated with lean mass change in older, community-dwelling adults: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition (Health ABC) Study
    [nutritional epidemiology study with HR<2, very weak evidence]

    British Journal of NUtrition 2016: Dietary protein intake is associated with better physical function and muscle strength among elderly women
    [nutritional epidemiology study with HR<2, very weak evidence]

  8. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults [systematic review of randomized trials; strong evidence]

    Nutrients 2019: Nutrition and supplement update for the endurance athlete: Review and recommendations. [overview article; ungraded]

    Journal of Sports Science 2011: Dietary protein for athletes: from requirements to optimum adaptation [overview article; ungraded]

  9. “Reference body weight” is a rough approximation of your lean body mass – the part that needs protein. You can look up your reference body weight here or use the simple chart below to estimate your protein needs.

    British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults [strong evidence]

  10. Some studies report added muscle-building benefit up to about 3.5 grams of daily protein per kilo of bodyweight, which is about 285 grams of protein for a 180 pound (81 kilo) individual.”

    Nutrition Reviews 2020: Dose-response relationship between protein intake and muscle mass increase: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    [systematic review of randomized trials; strong evidence]

  11. In this case, height is a proxy for reference body weight. Reference body weight is a way of estimating how much lean body mass a person of a specific height would have and thus how much protein they need on a daily basis.

  12. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019: Long-term effects of a novel continuous remote care intervention including nutritional ketosis for the management of type 2 diabetes: A 2-Year non-randomized clinical trial [nonrandomized study, weak evidence]

  13. Nutrition and Metabolism (London) 2004: Comparison of energy-restricted very low carbohydrate and low fat diets on weight loss and body composition in overweight men and women [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  14. Nutrition and Metabolism (London) 2020: Effects of weight loss during a very low carbohydrate diet on specific adipose tissue depots and insulin sensitivity in older adults with obesity: a randomized clinical trial [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  15. Journal of Nutrition 2015: A lower-carbohydrate, higher-fat diet reduces abdominal and intermuscular fat and increases insulin sensitivity in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  16. Journal of the International Societ of Sports Nutrition 2020: Effects of a ketogenic diet on body composition and strength in trained women[randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  17. American Journal of Physiology, Endocrinology, and Metabolism 2017 “Calories in, calories out” and macronutrient intake: the hope, hype, and science of calories
    [overview article; ungraded]

  18. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise 2017:
    Effects of weight loss on lean mass, strength, bone, and aerobic capacity
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  19. 2014: Lifestyle intervention involving calorie restriction with or without aerobic exercise training improves liver fat in adults with visceral adiposity
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  20. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015 Changes in body composition over 8 years in a randomized trial of a lifestyle intervention: the look AHEAD study
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  21. In a 12-day randomized crossover study, people were allowed to eat as much as they wanted on a high protein, normal protein, and a low protein diet. During the high protein portion of the trial, they consumed 500-550 calories less than they did during the normal protein and low protein portion of the trial:

    The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013: Protein leverage affects energy intake of high protein diets in humans [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

    A systematic review of randomized controlled trials found that higher protein diets tend to promote weight loss, due in part to reducing hunger and increasing satiety:

    Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2004: The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review [systematic review of randomized trials; strong evidence]

  22. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2013: Contribution of gastroenteropancreatic appetite hormones to protein-induced satiety [randomized crossover trial; moderate evidence]

    Nutrition Journal 2014: Effects of high protein vs. high fat snacks on appetite control, satiety, and eating initiation in healthy women [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

    Advances in Nutrition 2015: Controversies surrounding high protein diet intake: satiating effect and kidney and bone health [review of observational studies; weak evidence]

  23. Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2004: The effects of high protein diets on thermogenesis, satiety and weight loss: a critical review [systematic review of randomized trials; strong evidence]

  24. Obesity Reviews 2014: Do ketogenic diets really suppress appetite? A systematic review and meta-analysis [strong evidence]

  25. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders 2013: The effects of modified alternate-day fasting diet on weight loss and CAD risk factors in overweight and obese women [nonrandomized study, weak evidence]

  26. Practicing cyclical intermittent energy restriction every two weeks led to 26.4 pounds (12 kilos) of fat-mass loss compared to 17.6 pounds (8 kilos) for chronic calorie restriction. Although this protocol is different from many intermittent fasting studies, it demonstrates the success and feasibility of cycling energy restriction. While continuous caloric restriction is usually not sustainable long-term, two weeks of caloric restriction alternating with energy balance might be doable for a greater number of people.

    International Journal of Obesity (London) 2018: Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  27. Nutrients 2020: The effects of intermittent fasting combined with resistance training on lean body mass: A systematic review of human studies
    [review of randomized and non randomized studies study; weak evidence]

    As an example, the following randomized controlled trial demonstrated people following 16:8 time-restricted eating plus resistance training decreased fat mass and maintained muscle mass. The diet contained 22% of calories from protein.

    Journal of Translational Medicine 2016:
    Effects of eight weeks of time-restricted feeding (16/8) on basal metabolism, maximal strength, body composition, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk factors in resistance-trained males
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  28. JAMA Internal Medicine 2020: Effects of Time-Restricted Eating on Weight Loss and Other Metabolic Parameters in Women and Men With Overweight and Obesity: The TREAT Randomized Clinical Trial[randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  29. American Journal of Nutrition 1979: Loss of body nitrogen on fasting
    [non-controlled study; weak evidence]

    Klinische Wochenschrift 1975: Nitrogen loss in normal and obese subjects during total fast
    [non-controlled study; weak evidence]

  30. Current Obesity Reports 2015: Alcohol consumption and obesity: An update[overview article; ungraded]

  31. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2018: Sugar addiction: From evolution to revolution[overview article; ungraded]

  32. Public Health Nutrition 2019: Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them[overview article; ungraded]

  33. Journal of Applied Physiology 1985:
    Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults
    [randomized trial; moderate evidence]

    Combining resistance training and high-intensity cardio may help you gain muscle mass and lose fat mass. “Interventions that combine high-intensity aerobic and high-load resistance training exert beneficial effects that are superior to any other exercise modality at decreasing abdominal adiposity, improving lean body mass, and increasing cardiorespiratory fitness”.

    Obesity Reviews 2021: What exercise prescription is optimal to improve body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults living with obesity? A network meta-analysis[review of observational and randomized studies; weak evidence]

  34. Sports Medicine 2021: The effect of resistance training in healthy adults on body fat percentage, fat mass and visceral fat: A systematic review and meta-analysis [systematic review of randomized trials; strong evidence]

  35. These recommendations are based upon consensus among fitness professionals and are not based on scientific studies.

  36. Active rest means staying active even if you’re not purposefully exercising. Go for a walk. Do some light stretching. Play a physical game for fun. Just don’t sit on the couch all day!

  37. Journal of Applied Physiology 1985: Effects of aerobic and/or resistance training on body mass and fat mass in overweight or obese adults[randomized trial; moderate evidence]

  38. Doing higher intensity exercise for shorter periods of time can be an effective alternative to longer duration, moderate cardio. See below for more information about high-intensity interval training (HIIT).

  39. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases 2013: Is high-intensity exercise better than moderate-intensity exercise for weight loss?[non-controlled study; weak evidence]

  40. BMJ Open 2016: Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a ‘matrix’ based on BMI and waist circumference [retrospective observational study; very weak evidence]

  41. Obesity Reviews 2014: Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis [strong evidence]

  42. Journal Diabetes Science and Technology 2008: Body composition methods: comparisons and interpretation
    [overview article; ungraded]

    Journal of Investigative Medicine 2018: Advanced body composition assessment: from body mass index to body composition profiling
    [overview article; ungraded]

  43. Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging 2019: Assessment of body composition in health and disease using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA): A critical overview
    [overview article; ungraded]

  44. Medicine, Science, Sports and Exercise 1999:
    A new air displacement method for the determination of human body composition
    [overview article; ungraded]

  45. American Journal of HUman Biology 1992: Estimation of body fat from skinfold thicknesses in middle-aged and older men and women: A multiple component approach
    [overview article; ungraded]