Salt restriction lacks solid evidence

salt shaker on black kitchen table

“Don’t worry, Doc. I eat really well. I completely avoid salt so I’m good.” I hear this multiple times per day. It is ingrained in our mindset that we need to avoid salt to be healthy. This must be steeper in solid, unquestionable scientific evidence, right?

Not quite.

The New York Times: Scant evidence behind the advice about salt

The American Heart Association recommends the general population eat less than 2.3 grams of sodium per day, with higher risk and heart failure patients eating less than 1.5 grams per day. That is less than a teaspoon of salt for the entire day. This recommendation is based on studies such as the DASH trial that showed a small blood pressure reduction in certain subsets of people with a low sodium diet. There was no outcome data to demonstrate fewer heart attacks or deaths, but the assumption was that it would lead to those unproven benefits. In addition, the studies don’t differentiate between sodium in a bag of potato chips versus Celtic sea salt added to steamed veggies with olive oil.

Interestingly, those same studies also showed high potassium diets reduce blood pressure and negate any benefit from sodium reductions. Yet that has not been promoted as much as low sodium.

In order to better understand the quality of evidence behind salt restriction, a recent study in JAMA Internal Medicine investigated all the randomized controlled trials investigating sodium restriction in heart failure patients. Their findings were surprising.

Only nine studies were of high enough quality to meet inclusion criteria, and the studies showed conflicting results. Salt restriction is one of the most commonly accepted “truths” in cardiology, and yet there are only nine conflicting studies to support it. That truly is surprising.

While this does not prove salt is unimportant in heart failure or hypertension, it does emphasize the importance of understanding the strength of evidence behind recommendations.

The counter argument is that the strength of evidence does not matter as there is no harm from salt restriction, and all cardiologists have anecdotal evidence of someone who had a high salt meal and ended up in the hospital with a heart failure exacerbation. While anecdotal experience is important, it does confuse our recommendations for general populations. That is where we need more extensive research.

More importantly, it turns out there may be a risk to recommending a low-salt diet. The PURE study, a large observational trial in almost 100,000 subjects, showed the highest mortality rates both in diets above 6 grams of sodium per day and below 3 grams per day. This was an observational study so it does not prove it was the sodium ingestion driving the mortality rates, but it should be enough to question recommending less than 1.5 grams per day without strong evidence to do so.

Other potential harms are that restricting sodium may divert attention from more effective interventions such as increasing natural potassium containing foods (i.e. real food vegetables) and avoiding processed foods and simple carbohydrates. Last, it is really hard to restrict sodium to less than 1.5 grams per day. Many if not most people cannot maintain it. It might set people up for failure, which may be demoralizing and cause people to give up.

As there is a real world cost to restricting sodium, we should be confident that the science backs the recommendation. Unfortunately, questions seem to remain. Instead of necessarily restricting salt equally for all individuals, we may want to focus on promoting eating patterns that we can maintain for the long term. Focus on real foods first, and then address the specific salt and macro components for each individual.

Thanks for reading,
Bret Scher, MD FACC


The truth about salt

Cardiologist in Houston Chronicle: ‘Want a healthier heart? Eat a steak’

Heart disease


  1. habich
  2. Linda
    Very interesting, thank you
  3. Mariane Cunningham
    My doctor always tells me to restrict my salt so I don’t get high blood pressure. I just smile and say ‘ok’.
  4. Dan
    For five years, I'd get lightheaded. Dizzy. Lips would start to go numb and light would start to close in around me as I stood up. Went to my PC doctor. Went several times to a neurologist. None of them could tell me what was wrong. Went to a chiropractor, thinking maybe my neck was misaligned, and pinching blood supply or something. Wore a heart monitor for 24 hours to see if something was wrong there. Nothing.

    Then, a friend had me try salt tablets. Took two with a full glass of water every morning. That's it. After a week or so, I was completely changed. I knew I'd had somewhat low blood pressure, and the salt helped raise it a bit. Just a bit. But I can now stand right up and immediately run up or down the stairs without my knees buckling as I almost pass out.

    So I like salt.

  5. Nkengacha Marcellous Agendia
    Science is really taking another turn. First, they lied that Diabetes can not be cured. Now, amongst other lies they said we should restrict salts intake. Just another big scam centered on biased research.

    Thank you doctor for clearing the airs.

  6. Brenda
    My blood pressure is a little low and occasionally caused dizziness, my endocrinologist suggested upping salt intake and I now am more generous with my Celtic salt and this is working. I have also started taking 2 tsp of apple cider vinegar (diluted) before meals and feel a lot less hungry for longer so it is assisting me to extend the fast times and reduce meals to 2 per day.
  7. Helen Batting
    My fairly healthy 80 year-old mother was put on a restricted salt diet but she overdid it and became psychopathic - absolutely terrified of everyday objects! On hospitalization her blood tests showed up the problem, and the doctors told us that insufficient salt had 'softened her brain-stem' (?) She became calmer when given salt again, but she never recovered fully and died a year later of 'senility'.

Leave a reply

Reply to comment #0 by

Older posts