News
Top blogs
Podcast
Topics
EventsWhy calorie counting can be an eating disorder
in Calorie counting, Crazy ways to lose weight, Insulin, Paleo diets 
Can calorie counting be an eating disorder? I think so. When I wrote it quite a few people got upset, including a reader by the name of Brittany. But she gave it some thought – and then she really got the point. In fact, she expresses it more eloquently than I ever could.
Here’s her email:
Hi Andreas,
My name is Brittany and I live in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. I just wanted to thank you for the posts you had on calorie counting. I’ve well understood for over a year that a primal/LCHF way of eating is ideal and have managed to lose weight (210 lbs down to the mid 180s at 5’6″ now). However, my DailyBurn Tracker app on my phone was my crutch. I’d keep track of my macronutrient ratios and calories (since I was overeating, even if it was healthy foods) every. single. meal.
When I read your post about calorie counting being an eating disorder, I was kind of put off and defensive about it. I browsed forums of my fellow primal eaters to see how they went about ensuring they weren’t eating too much. I kept trying to validate my need to have these silly numbers and information about my food.
Then your whole point hit me:
I’ve been so inspired by the diets of our evolutionary ancestors and other aspects of their lives (minimalist footwear, good sleep, etc) that I completely ignored my body’s natural ability to tell me when I’m hungry and when I’m full. Counting calories is so artificial and so far removed from the direction I was trying to take my life. I stopped at the beginning of this month and I enjoy my food more. I feel less neurotic about tracking macronutrient ratios (just keeping my carbohydrate intake in check, which comes naturally now) and don’t feel pressured to eat more/less to hit my “calorie goal”. We’ve got built in calorie counters! We just have to tune into our natural way of eating and things will right themselves.
While I wasn’t thrilled with the idea at first, I really appreciate the hard look you took at calorie counting. It helped me review my own habit and I feel so much better for it!
Our bodies are such amazing machines; we really do underestimate them!
I appreciate all the hard work you do in educating others, myself included.
My thanks,
Brittany
Can you trust your body?
Brittany is exactly right. Believing that we need to count calories means we’re severely underestimating our bodies’ natural abilities.
What if I told you I know someone who counts his every breath and tries to make sure the number of breaths matches his calculated need for oxygen? Who’s afraid to sleep and lose count of his breaths?
Or someone who weighs all her food and all her feces, to make sure that she’s not getting constipated?
These people would be considered eccentric at best, profoundly disturbed at worst. And it’s really not that different from counting calories. It’s about not at all trusting your body’s amazing ability to regulate its energy needs by feelings of hunger and satiety.
The real problem
A weight issue is not caused by a lack of counting calories. No more than constipation is caused by not counting… you know what. They’re both caused by something disturbing the body’s natural regulatory systems.
The real problem behind obesity? It could be many things. But today, by far the most likely problem is too much of the fat-storing hormone insulin. Usually caused by decades of ingesting too much sugar and too much processed, rapidly digested carbs. Which is what the Western diet is composed of today. It messes up our hunger and satiety systems, makes us want to eat too much. Voilá: An epidemic of obesity.
Calorie counting will never cure this problem. It’s just a crutch. And the more we rely on it, the greater the likelihood of it turning into an eating disorder.
We need to fix the problem, not pretend that it’s normal to be hungry.
64 comments
Theory debunked.
"I’ve well understood for over a year that a primal/LCHF way of eating is ideal and have managed to lose weight (210 lbs down to the mid 180s at 5’6″ now). However, my DailyBurn Tracker app on my phone was my crutch. I’d keep track of my macronutrient ratios and calories (since I was overeating, even if it was healthy foods) every. single. meal."
Let's split the difference and call "mid 180s" 185. So starting at 210, which is obese, and now at ~185, which is still on the edge of obesity according to BMI. 25 lbs in over a year. Progress is progress, so I'm not trying to disparage Brittany here, but 25 lbs in over 52 weeks, especially starting out as obese, is very mediocre. Even understanding that long bouts of fat loss will result in some plateaus along the way, an obese person should reliably hit at least 1lb/wk in that time frame.
So while Brittany is moving in a positive direction, she isn't exactly a source I would say "well understands" anything regarding diet and nutrition.
How people who adhere to restriction-based diets, be it low carb, low fat, only this, only that, not understand that the weight loss results from a negative energy balance is beyond me. Forever and always, until the end of time.
You can count or not count, I don't care, but the laws of thermodynamics win in the end. You don't gain without eating more than your body can utilize, and you don't lose without eating less than your body is utilizing.
Just like I can grow my bank account by following a strict budget, and know that each week I'll deposit $100 into my savings, or I can go about it willy nilly, and deposit whatever I have left at the end of the month. Maybe some months result in a $423 deposit, others $511, others $199. But the only way I grow my account is by spending less than I earn, and the only way my account shrinks is by spending more than I earn.
Technically correct
On calories, morons and stupidities blessed by the majorities
Harp about the upside-down food pyramid all you want, but potato chips, french fries, ding dongs, twinkies, candy, etc are not on the food pyramid. The food pyramid may not be optimal, but it is not instructing people to gorge themselves on shitty food. Eating a bunch of oatmeal doesn't make you fat. Carbs don't make you fat. Eating too much does. Otherwise, Japan and Vietnam would be massively obese with all their rice consumption.
Why is it that everyone who comes at diet with some skin in the game (i.e. sells their services to endorse a paleo diet, or low carb diet, or warrior diet, or intermittent fasting, or whatever the fuck) equates counting calories with eating fucking sugar all day long?
Guess what, you can eat a well balanced diet, with plenty of protein, fat, carbs, and fiber, with good food sources, AND count calories. And it works!
How calorie-focused thinking about obesity and related diseases may mislead and harm public health. An alternative
Caloric restriction results: 3 Kg lost after 4 years of dieting
Counting calories has no scientific backup and it's blatantly moronic:
On calories, morons and stupidities blessed by the majorities
Thermodynamics, for dummies
The dumbest thing ever
In nutrition science, the blind lead the blind
All of your points are strawmen.
It's the HFLC side that greatly, greatly overestimates improved metabolism by reducing carb intake. Any controlled study has yet to see it, once controlled for protein.
Lose the weight following the advice from the experts
A calorie is not a calorie (and its corollary, an expert is not an expert)