A new paradigm of insulin resistance


Our current paradigm of insulin resistance is that of a lock and key, and it’s simply wrong.

Insulin is a hormone that acts upon a hormonal receptor on a cell surface in order to have an effect. This is often referred to as lock and key model.

The lock is the insulin receptor which keeps the gates to the cell closed. When the proper key (insulin) is inserted, then the gate opens to let glucose from the blood inside the cell. This glucose is then able to power the cell machinery.

Once you remove the key (insulin) then the gate closes back up and glucose in the blood is no longer able to go inside the cell.

Lock and key during insulin resistance

What happens during the phenomenon of insulin resistance? Classically, we imagine that the lock and key no longer fit very well. The key (insulin) is able to open the lock (receptor) but only partially and not very well. As a result, the glucose is not able to pass through the gate normally.

Insul ResistanceThis results in lower than normal amounts of glucose inside the cell. The glucose, which is now blocked by the closed gate, piles up outside the cell in the blood, which we can detect as elevated blood sugar and make the clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.

This has also been described as a state of internal starvation since the cell has little glucose on the inside. The knee-jerk reaction is for the body to increase production of insulin (key). Since each key works less well than previously, the body over-produces the number of keys to make sure that enough glucose goes into the cells. A nice neat theory.

The problems

The problem, really, is that this paradigm does not really fit reality. First, is the problem the insulin, or the insulin receptor? Well, it’s really quite easy these days to look at the structure of insulin and the structure of the insulin receptor of insulin resistance patients. You simply isolate the insulin or some cells and check their structure with fancy molecular tools. It immediately becomes clear that there is nothing wrong with either the insulin or the receptor. So what’s the deal?

The only remaining possibility is that there is something that is gumming up the system. Some kind of blocker that interferes with mechanism of the lock and key. But what? There’s all kinds of theories. Inflammation. Oxidative Stress. Advance glycation End Products. All the usual buzzwords that come out when doctors have really no idea. With this model, we have no real friggin’ idea what caused the insulin resistance. Without understanding what causes IR, we have no chance of treating it.

Lustig1Then there’s the central paradox of hepatic insulin resistance. Let me explain. Insulin has two major actions on the liver. Remember that insulin goes up when you eat. It tells the body to stop producing glucose in the liver (gluconeogenesis) because there is lots of glucose coming in from the stomach (food). This is mediated through the FOX01 pathway.

The second major action in the liver is to increase the production of fat (De Novo Lipogenesis (DNL)). This is to deal with the incoming flood of glucose that the body can’t use right way. This is mediated through the SREBP-1c pathway.

So, if the liver becomes insulin resistant, then the effect of insulin should drop for both of these actions. That is, the liver should continue to make glucose, and stop making fat. But that’s only the case for gluconeogenesis. That is, during insulin resistance, the liver continues to make new glucose as expected. But DNL (making new fat) continues and actually increases. So insulin’s effect on DNL is not blunted but accelerated!

What the hell?

How in seven hells can this insulin resistant liver selectively be resistant to one effect of insulin yet accelerate the effect of the other? In the very same cell, in response to the very same levels of insulin, with the very same insulin receptor? That seems crazy. The same cell is insulin resistance and insulin sensitive at the same time!

A better explanation: overflow

How can we explain this paradox?

We need a new paradigm of insulin resistance that better fits the facts. In fact, we can think of insulin resistance as an overflow phenomenon, instead of a lock and key one. All we really know about insulin resistance is that it is much more difficult to move glucose into an ‘insulin resistant’ cell than a normal one.

But this does not necessarily mean that the door is jammed. Instead, perhaps the cell is already overflowing with glucose and therefore more glucose cannot go in.

Imagine the cell to be a subway car. When the door opens, the passengers on the outside (glucose in the blood) march in a nice orderly manner into the empty subway car (cell). Normally, it doesn’t really require much of a push to get this glucose into the cell (insulin gives the push).

But during insulin resistance, the problem is not that the door does not open. The problem, instead is that the subway car (cell) is already overflowing with passengers (glucose). Now the glucose outside the cell simply can’t get in and is left crowded on the platform.

Insulin tries to push the glucose into the cell like the Japanese Subway Pushers, but they simply can’t do it because it’s full. So, it looks like the cell is resistant to the effects of the insulin, but really the problem is that the cell is already overflowing. So, the knee jerk reaction is to manufacture more insulin (pushers) to help push glucose into the cell. Which works, but only for a while.

So, the cell is not in a state of ‘internal starvation’. Instead, the cell is overflowing with glucose. Glucose starts spilling into the blood, which looks like gluconeogenesis has not been stopped consistent with insulin resistance. But what happens to fat production?

In the classic model of insulin resistance, the paradox was that DNL was enhanced, not decreased which looked a lot like heightened insulin sensitivity instead of resistance. But in the overflow model, the DNL would be enhanced because the cell is trying to rid itself of the excess glucose by producing extra fat. The cell is overflowing and not in an ‘internal starvation’ mode.

Why it matters

Why is this critically important? Because understanding this new paradigm will lead to the answer of how insulin resistance develops and what we can do about it. The problem does not lie with either insulin nor the insulin receptor. Both are normal. The problem is that the cell is completely stuffed full of glucose. So, what caused it?

The answer then seems obvious – it’s a matter of too much glucose and too much insulin. In other words, it was the insulin itself that caused the insulin resistance. We don’t need to chase shadows looking for some mysterious cause of insulin resistance.

Once we understand that excessive glucose and excessive insulin is the cause of the insulin resistance, then we can now devise a rational treatment. Reduce insulin and reduce glucose. Once you reverse the insulin resistance, you cure the type 2 diabetes.

A better way

How to Reverse Type 2 Diabetes

Earlier by Dr. Fung

Why the first law of thermodynamics is utterly irrelevant

How to fix your broken metabolism by doing the exact opposite

The Biggest Loser FAIL and that ketogenic study success


The Perfect Treatment
The Etiology of Obesity – Dr. Jason Fung

More with Dr. Fung

Dr. Fung has his own blog at intensivedietarymanagement.com. He is also active on Twitter.

His book The Obesity Code is available on Amazon.

The Obesity Code


  1. 1 comment removed
  2. Helena
    The excess fat that is produced by the cells as a responce to the overflow, how does that enter in the fatcells? I have thought it is by the same mecanics as other cells, with the functions of insulin. Fatcells from what I understand have no limits to how much they can expand unlike other cells in the body. Which means it will never be flooded in the same way?
    I am wondering about why some people get fat first and then develop diabetes T2 whilst others stay slim and still develop DT2? Is the ability to store away the fat a protection and if so is the development of DT2 a faster process in slim people?
    Reply: #4
  3. Stealth
    How does that work for "reactive hypoglycemia" that some of us with insulin resistance experience? Our blood glucose rises precipitously from ingesting too much glucose and then suddenly drops low as the cells finally respond and take up the glucose. How is that explained in your model?

    I have had blood glucose levels spike into the high 100's and then drop quickly to the low 50's after ingesting too much sugar--I felt like I was dying! (And yes, I avoid excess carbs and try not to ever do that anymore).

  4. Ian
    Hi Helena. As I understand it, insulin has different effects on different cells. It increases fat uptake in fat cells and decreases it in muscles (Gary Taubes GCBC p397)
    It does so through LPL.
    Fat cells can expand and increase in number.
  5. Antonio
    The idea can be supported by this paper
  6. Angel
    Hi. I propose another possibility.
    Glucagon or cortisol is/are high and they produce that liver create more glucose, even when not necessary. Then this extra level of glucose produce extra insulin but the glucose do not fall because the liver is producing more and more glucose. Only if glucagon and cortisol and adrenalin goes down, then the glucose goes down and the insulin goes down.
  7. Deep
    I am following intermittent fasting(6:30 PM to 10:30 AM) from last 8 months every day.
    But loss my weight only 5kg from i started.
    Please guide me i have to follow any another way of intermittent fasting.
  8. Darrell W
    My waking glucose is high upon waking "dawn phenomena??" but the longer I go without eating the higher it gets or at least it never really drops, I eat my first meal around 11:30 during the beginning of my "eating window" and my levels lower considerably? I'm stumped should I continue IF? Will this response decline over time as my liver dumps the excess? I was diagnosed type 2 last November 2017 and the keto eating style has really helped overall except for this one hiccup. Any advise would be greatly appreciated.
  9. Ross Albert Wenk
    It's the nitric oxide, or lack there of.
    Sugar and heated/reheated veg oils attack the endothelial cells and screw up eNOS.
    Without the NO, insulin can't get to the cells, so sugar builds up, the body freaks out and make ever more insulin to try to get to cells... the higher sugar attacks the endothelial cells more...viscous cycle.
    The solution is to eat more leafy greens as part of a keto diet, and possibly some EVO to aid in repair of endothelial cells.

Leave a reply

Reply to comment #0 by

Older posts