Läkaren som inte låter sig tystas
Dr Gary Fettke är en LCHF-budbärare som myndigheterna, i likhet med professorn i Sydafrika, har försökt tystas. Allt detta bara för att han har gett sina patienter bra kostråd, som att överviktiga och diabetiker bör undvika kolhydrater.
Som tur är vägrar dr Fettke att låta sig tystas. I vår intervju förklarar han vad som har hänt honom och varför det är en principsak att stå upp mot dogmatiska kostråd.
Se ett par minuter av intervjun ovan (transkription). Hela den 15 minuter långa intervjun med svensk text och transkription ser du här med provmånad eller medlemskap:
Läkaren som inte låter sig tystas – Dr Gary Fettke
Bli medlem (gratis att testa en månad) och du får omedelbar tillgång till föreläsningar, intervjuer, videokurser, frågor och svar, filmer och mycket mera. Du får också tillgång till vårt populära verktyg veckomenyer.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-sh...
"How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat
The sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960s to play down the link between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, newly released historical documents show.
The internal sugar industry documents, recently discovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, and published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, suggest that five decades of research into the role of nutrition and heart disease, including many of today’s dietary recommendations, may have been largely shaped by the sugar industry."
"“They were able to derail the discussion about sugar for decades,” said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at U.C.S.F. and an author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper."
mLCHFh B-) .
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-industry-sh...
mLCHFh B-) .
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio....
"Sugar industry sponsorship of germ-free rodent studies linking sucrose to hyperlipidemia and cancer: An historical analysis of internal documents"!!!
"The Sugar Association, a United States sucrose industry trade association [8] (which has organizational ties to SRF, the International Sugar Research Foundation [ISRF], and ISRF’s successor, the World Sugar Research Organisation, based in London, UK [9]), has consistently denied [10–12] that sucrose has any metabolic effects related to chronic disease beyond its caloric effects. On January 5, 2016, the Sugar Association issued a press release [13] criticizing findings from a study published in Cancer Research [14] using multiple mouse models that suggested that dietary sugar induces increased tumor growth and metastasis when compared to a nonsugar starch diet. The Sugar Association stated that “no credible link between ingested sugars and cancer has been established.” In contrast, this paper provides empirical data suggesting that the sugar industry terminated funding of an animal study that was finding unfavorable results with respect to the association between dietary sugars and cancer, with possible translational importance to humans."
mLCHFh B-) .