Archive | Food
left
A New Way to Get Fat in Sweden 45
Death by McDonalds 47
What’s Wrong with this Picture? 30
“Have Some Candy” 36
Glenn Pendlay is Pissed. Are You? 33
Do You Want Sugar Or Trans Fat with Your Coffee? 43
Margarine Manufacturer in “Partnership” With Major Newspaper 18
“The World is Fucking Insane” 30
Another Train Wreck: Heart & Stroke Foundation Recommends Eating Candy 12
What Does “Natural” Really Mean? 18
Seal of Approval on Goodies Macabre 12
Can You Prevent Cancer with Millions of Cinnamon Buns? 32
right

A New Way to Get Fat in Sweden

DunkinDonuts_donut_box-800x533

Perfect for weight gain

Soon there will be another fast-food chain that can spread the obesity epidemic in Sweden. American Dunkin’ Donuts – most famous for its addictive and sugar-laden donuts – is now on track to open 30 restaurants in Sweden:

The Wall Street Journal: Dunkin’ Brands to Expand into Sweden

It’s hard to imagine worse news for the average weight in Sweden. Hopefully the welcome will be lukewarm. Continue Reading →

45

Do You Want Sugar Or Trans Fat with Your Coffee?

creamer-629x800

Have you tried coffee creamer with your coffee?

A reader sent me a couple of pictures from an Air Europa flight. The only thing they offered with coffee was a package of powder, like the one above. Guess what’s inside?  Continue Reading →

43

Best Advice Ever?

best-advice-ever
Continue Reading →

15

Margarine Manufacturer in “Partnership” With Major Newspaper

guardian-unilever-650x202

Here’s bad news if you want to be able to trust what you read in the newspaper.

Unilever – the manufacturer behind low-fat margarine among other things – now announces that they have started a “partnership” with major British newspaper The Guardian. The idea is that Unilever pays the newspaper a lot of money (a 7-digit number). Apart from that the partnership is based on…

…shared values of sustainable living and open storytelling.

What do these fine words mean? I recommend the entertaining analysis by Andrew Sullivan. The fine language is called “bullshit”, used to cover up the truth. What it’s really about  - not surprisingly – is to disguise the industry’s propaganda so that it will look like independent journalism and become more efficient.

It’s very simple. Newspapers are having trouble finding sources of income. Unilever wants a credible platform for their advertising, where it looks like journalism. Win-win. Except for the readers, who will find it increasingly difficult to know what is news and what is advertising.

Just an example: Why spend money on TV commercials for low-fat margarine when planted newspaper articles about how “harmful” natural fats, such as butter, are a lot more effective?

In Sweden Unilever has been found in violation of the law several times for such disguised advertisements for margarine. Now the UK risks seeing the same thing happen at a totally new scale. Continue Reading →

18

The Reason Kids Get Fat

mello1-650x435-1

This is the entry to my grocery store. It’s time for one of many Song Festival Competition nights, selecting Sweden’s entry to the Eurovision Song Contest 2014, and this means going face down in sugar. It’s only once a year!

Or wait, it’s not just once a year we’re binging on bad carbs. It’s every day we can find an excuse, that is, most days.

This is the real cause of children’s obesity. It’s not that they were born with stomachs that needed to be surgically removed, no matter what some think.

And no, children with a weight problem don’t need to eat candy and drink soda. Not even a little. Not at all. No more than a person with pulmonary disease needs to smoke a cigarette. No more than an alcoholic needs a drink.

What children with weight problems need is a home free of temptations, and to eat themselves satisfied on real food. Weight loss without hunger. Parents can provide the children that opportunity. Continue Reading →

39

What Does “Natural” Really Mean?

What does the label “natural” mean in ads for junk food? How about “100% natural”? Watch this commercial from the “False Advertising Agency” and you’ll know.

The video is produced by a company behind labeling of organic foods in the U.S.

Even better than looking for labels would be to eat real food. You can find this by using Michael Pollan’s suggested rules. For example, don’t eat anything that never rots, and nothing with ingredients impossible to pronounce (or with more than five of them). Continue Reading →

18

The Margarine Giant Gives Up: Butter Wins

Gigantic margarine manufacturer Unilever is starting to give up the fight. Fewer and fewer people want artificial margarine, and fewer and fewer people are still unnecessarily afraid of all-natural butter.

In many countries – including the US – the sale of margarine is plummeting, while the sales of butter are increasing more and more.

In a new strategy, Unilever in Germany (and Finland), now blends butter into its cheap margarine – new TV commercial above.

Quartz: The war against butter is over. Butter won.

Bloomberg: I Can’t Believe It’s Butter in My Unilever Rama Spread

“Margarine has become a marker for cheap, processed, artificial, unhealthy food,” says Marion Nestle, a New York University nutrition professor. “The irony is hilarious. Unilever went to a lot of trouble to formulate healthy margarines, but the zeitgeist has caught up with them.” Continue Reading →

53

McDonald’s: Don’t Eat Our Food – It’s Not Good for Your Health

Information for employees

Information for employees

Just in time for the holidays, fast-food restaurant McDonald’s got caught being surprisingly honest.

On a website for its own employees McDonald’s warns against eating fast food because it can lead to overweight. A picture corresponding to McDonald’s own main product Big Mac & Co is labeled “unhealthy choice”.

McDonald’s apparently doesn’t want its employees to get fat and sick, and so advises them not to eat the food that they serve. Perhaps McDonald’s should be equally honest with their customers? How about writing “unhealthy choice” in appropriate places on the menu as well?

16

Another Train Wreck: Heart & Stroke Foundation Recommends Eating Candy

freedhoff

Here’s another nutritional advice train wreck. The Canadian Heart and Stroke Foundation allows their “Health Check” symbol to be put on candy. Why? As far as I can tell because the candy uses the word “fruit” in its name.

CTV News: Ottawa doctor says Heart and Stroke Foundation is misleading parents over a “Health Check” product

Putting the spotlight on this insanity is one of my heroes, dr Yoni Freedhoff. Here are two recent posts from his blog:

The Heart and Lung Foundation put out a press release saying that they are trying to develop a “comprehensive position” on sugar and will be soliciting international experts to help out. Meanwhile they’ll keep recommending candy.

Here’s dr Freedhoff’s comment:

So what exactly do the Heart and Stroke Foundation’s Health Check Registered Dietitians do for the Foundation if Health Check needs to ask for outside help to determine whether or not endorsing fruit juice gummis that are themselves 80% sugar by weight with virtually no associated nutrition is a good idea?

I guess what I’m trying to say is that if your organization needs international experts to tell them selling candy as a health food is a bad idea, perhaps you might want to consider the possibility that there’s something wrong with your organization’s own expertise.

I’d rephrase that last message for the Heart and Stroke Foundation:

If your organization believes that selling candy as a health food is OK, then your organization has zero credibility.

Bottom line: choose. You can have the candy money or you can have credibility. You can’t have both.

Continue Reading →

12

Seal of Approval on Goodies Macabre

Cancer for dessert

Cancer for dessert

Can we prevent breast cancer – a disease for which the risk increases with overweight – by contributing to an increased consumption of cinnamon buns and fancy pastries in the midst of an obesity epidemic?

The ill-conceived and dishonest sponsorship by the Pink Ribbon and the Swedish Cancer Society drew criticism in Swedish local paper Corren from myself, among others:

The Swedish Cancer Society responds by trying to shift the blame:

So, people who gain weight from eating cinnamon buns and pastry, thus increasing their risk of getting cancer, only have themselves to blame. Don’t blame the Cancer Society! They only, embarrassingly enough, happen to have their trade mark in advertisements for sweet baked goods. Apparently, they don’t accept any responsibility for the consequences.

Earlier

Can You Prevent Cancer with Millions of Cinnamon Buns?

12