Does eating 6-7 times a day make you eat less?


Is snacking a good strategy for weight loss?

How do you reign in hunger? We all think that eating more will prevent hunger, but is this really true? This is what is behind the advice to eat 6 or 7 times a day. If you can prevent hunger, then you may be able to make better food choices, or eat less.

On the surface, it seems pretty reasonable. However, on the surface, the calories in calories out paradigm also seem pretty reasonable, too. Like fool’s gold, appearances can be deceiving, and we must dig deeper to appreciate the truth, otherwise we are the fools. So, let’s think about this a little more.

Ghrelin2The advice to eat all the time to prevent hunger assumes that eating a little bit will stave off hunger. Is there any evidence this is true? That would be a big fat no. Somebody made it up, and it’s been repeated so many times that people assume it’s true.

Mostly, it’s been promoted heavily by the snack-food industry to make sure that people continue to buy their products.

Let’s take some analogous situations. Suppose you need to urinate. Which is easier?

  1. Just hold it until you find the right time/place.
  2. Pee just a tiny little amount and then stop yourself voluntarily. Do this repeatedly throughout the day.

You and I know full well that once that first bit of urine comes out, there’s no stopping until it’s done. How about this situation? Suppose you are thirsty – which is easier?

  1. Keep water out of sight and wait to drink until you find the right time/place and can drink your fill.
  2. Drink a thimbleful of water and then voluntarily stop drinking while looking at the full glass of ice cold water. Do this repeatedly throughout the day.

Again, you and I both know that once you get that first sip, there’s no stopping until the glass is empty. In both these cases, it is easier to simply wait. Once you start something, it is easier to continue until satisfied (empty bladder, thirst sated, hunger sated).

As with everything in life, there is a certain inertia (the tendency to keep doing what you are doing) to drinking, eating and urinating. It’s like my son. You can’t ever get him into the bath. Once he’s in, you can’t ever get him out of the bath. But this is normal behaviour. So why do we assume this does not apply to eating?

Does eating all the time make you less hungry?

Ghrelin1Some people would have you believe that eating a small amount will fill you up so that you can avoid eating so much. If this were true, what is the point of an appetizer? The hors d’oeuvre is literally served ‘outside the main meal’. For what purpose? So that we will spoil our dinner and cannot eat what the host has slaved over all day because we are full? Really? No. The whole point of an appetizer is that this is a small tasty morsel to make us eat more.

In French, this may also be called an amuse bouche – meaning literally ‘something that amuses the mouth’. Why? So that we will eat more. It’s not served to fill you up so that you can’t eat that expensive intricate meal prepared by the chef.

Virtually all cultures have this tradition to whet the appetite, not dull it. So eating a small, less than satiating amount of food, makes us more hungry, not less. So, eating a tiny bit, enough to make us hungry, and then voluntarily stopping will take enormous willpower throughout the entire day. Not a good idea.

Now think about a time where you weren’t really all that hungry, but it was breakfast time anyways. So you start eating because people have always said it’s the most important meal of the day. To your surprise, as you start eating, you finished an entire meal relatively normally.

Before you started eating, you could have easily skipped the meal and have been full. But once you started eating, you ate everything. Has this happened to you? It’s happened to me many, many times, mostly because I’m always aware of this fact.

Eating WHETS the appetite. Got it, McFly? We’ve known this for at least 150 years! Eating all the time so that you’ll eat less sounds really stupid, because it is really stupid. Don’t fall for it. If you hear a doctor or dietician giving you this advice, run far, far away, very quickly. They could literally kill you with their idiotic advice.

How to stay hungry

So what’s another really great way to increase your hunger and sabotage your weight loss efforts? Calorie reduced diets, of course. The portion control, or Caloric Reduction as Primary (CRaP) strategy of weight loss always leaves you hungry. This is a proven fact.

HORMONAL-ADAPTATIONS-2In a well known study on obesity, researchers took subjects, had them lose 10% of their body weight, and then followed their hormone levels over the next year. Ghrelin (more about this next time) is known as the hunger hormone – higher levels means you are more hungry. Peptide YY is a satiety hormone – higher levels means you’re more full.

After a year of maintaining their weight, there was a substantial difference in patients hormone levels. Ghrelin is much higher (more hungry). Peptide YY is much lower (more hungry). This translated into a measurable difference in hunger between the groups.

hormonal-adaptations-3The weight-loss group is measurable hungrier because their hormones are driving them to be hungrier. This is very important, because there is a tendency to play ‘blame the victim’. When people follow the CRaP advice and then regain their weight because they’re hungry, people think ‘oh, they have no will power’. THATS NOT THE CASE AT ALL.

They are hormonally driven to eat by hunger, so we should stop the silent accusations that people can control it. It’s not their fault. The problem is not with the people, the problem is the advice to eat smaller portions. It is a strategy guaranteed to fail.

After all, hunger is one of the strongest basic survival instincts. Yes, we can suppress it for a few days. But can we do it day after day, week after week, year after year?

People who have lost weight are physically, measurable hungrier than those that have not. You cannot solve this problem of long-term weight loss until you understand how to curb hunger. What is the answer?

Well, in case you haven’t figured it out yet, this only being the 28th post on fasting and all, the answer is fasting. There’s a certain logic here. If you eat all the time, you will get more hungry. If you eat less, you will get less hungry. How does that work? We’ll see next week…

Jason Fung


Intermittent Fasting for Beginners

How to Lose Weight

Top videos with Dr. Fung

  1. Diet Doctor Podcast #64 with Jason Fung
  2. Part 8 of Dr. Jason Fung's diabetes course
    The essential problem with type 2 diabetes
  4. Why low-fat diets don't work — Dr. Jason Fung's diabetes course
    The 2 big lies of type 2 diabetes
  6. The top 5 myths of fasting



  1. Cassandra
    You don't reign it in (like a monarch), you rein it in (like a runaway horse).
  2. J Lance De Foa, MD
    The "six little meals a day" originally came about as a solution to the hypoglycemia caused by sulfonylureas like glyburide, gliclazide and others. What is the solution to low blood glucose? Crackers! Others saw "diabetics" eating lots of small meals to manage their medicine's side effect and they thought that must be a "good" way to eat - "Hey, it manages diabetes, eh!".

    There are lots of examples of such misattribution. Dietary cholesterol is another. Of course the biggest such error is thinking the main culprit is the hyperglycemia - that too is an effect, a clinical sign. The main problem in "T2DM" is INSULIN-TOXICOSIS. High insulin causes HT, gout, glaucoma, PCOS, Heart Failure, atherosclerosis, the list keeps growing. It isn't actually all "resistance" since normal episodic insulin doesn't usually affect many of those organs. It's time for a name change and paradigm shift.

Leave a reply

Reply to comment #0 by

Older posts