The BMJ Criticism of the Dietary Guidelines Will NOT Be Retracted

butter1

A year ago the British Medical Journal published an article by Nina Teicholz that was very critical to the official US dietary guidelines, and the weak science supporting them. Specifically the article and the BMJ editor in chief criticized the low-fat, high-carb advice that was said to be “driving rather than solving the current epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes”.

The article resulted in furious resistance from old-school scientists. Even more than other people, scientists who have been deeply involved in this for decades likely have a very hard time shifting their thinking. Not fewer than 180 (!) of them signed a letter demanding the BMJ retract the article:

After an investigation, The BMJ has just now decided not to retract the article. They stand by it, as they should:

Fortunately The BMJ and its leadership refuse to be intimidated by those who would prefer to stop inconvenient questions and censor scientific debate.

Current dietary advice has completely failed to stop the epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes, and may very well have made them worse. We can’t solve the problem by forbidding people to talk about it.

Earlier

TIME: Eat Butter. Scientists Labeled Fat the Enemy. Why They Were Wrong.

The US Dietary Guidelines Expert Committee Said to be “Completely Dissociated” From the Top Level Scientific Community

The British Medical Journal Slams Unscientific and Biased Low-Fat Dietary Guidelines!

Credit Suisse: The Future is Lower Carb, Higher Fat

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Stop Worrying about Saturated Fat!

Headlines All Over the World: The Fear of Fat Was a Mistake from the Beginning

Top Nina Teicholz videos

  • Did the introduction of the dietary guidelines start the obesity epidemic?
  • The unknown story of vegetable oils
  • The big fat surprise
  • The myth of vegetable oils
  • Why our dietary guidelines are wrong
  • What about red meat and health?
  • Can red meat kill you?
  • Is the Mediterranean diet healthy?
  • Vegetable oils – the unknown story

4 comments

  1. RT
    This is great news. The individuals and organizations responsible for trying to suppress and distort the information in the BMJ article really should be ashamed of themselves. By trying to stifle free speech and valid health information, they are willfully contributing to serious global health issues. BMJ deserves credit for refusing to yield to such idiotic, pseudoscientific pressure tactics.
  2. Angus Claydon
    Fantastic news indeed, and couldn't have come at a better time. It gives us renewed confidence to again question our local health bodies in their approach to prevention of the major non-communicable diseases.
  3. Kirsten
    I think the results speak for themselves. I suppose it is always hard to admit you have been wrong for years.
  4. Francoise
    Fantastic news! Now, if only the US medical journals would be as open minded...? We can only hope....

Leave a reply

Reply to comment #0 by

Older posts